|
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
ADDITION
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG
BEACH
|
|
Significant Aspects of
the Project:
|
|
This building was the worlds
largest space-frame pyramid on its completion in 1994. Soaring
to 17 stories tall at its apex, this 45 degree pyramid is 345
feet square at the base and has no interior columns. The interior
has only two levels, one for the concourse and the other for the
lower court level. Convertible seating accommodates 6,500 spectators.
The frame is a multiple-layer space grid assembled with individual
tubular steel struts bolted at their ends to a plate node. The
assembled space frame behaves as a three-dimensional truss system
with axial loads carried primarily by the individual struts. There
are 57 different strut types and 22 different node types for a
total of 14,400 struts and 3,150 nodes; and the frame is supported
at 80 anchor locations.
|
|
Relationship to the Judging Criteria:
|
|
Creativity of Structural
Design: This multiple-layer space grid embodies a very modern
structural solution for one of the oldest forms of architecture:
a pyramid. The structural design complexities could be only managed
with state-of-the-art structural analysis, design, and drafting
software systems. Some of these tools were custom-made by research
and development staff at JAMA and ASI for the specific purpose
of design and drafting of multi-layered space grid systems.
|
|
Design Efficiency
of Materials or Labor Utilization: The final space frame design
incorporates 351 tons of steel, as compared to the 620 tons of
steel that would have been required for a traditional box-truss
design. To minimize fabrication costs, the frame was designed
with as few modular sub-assemblies as practical. The non-patented
structural framing system took advantage of common materials and
manufacturing processes to open fabrication to steel job shops,
resulting in per-pound fabrication costs competitive with conventional
structural steel.
|
|
How the
Design or Construction Methodology Provides for Cost
and/or Time Savings: Cost was the major factor
in the design of this space frame. In addition to the overall
lower cost of steel required for construction, the lightness of
the space frame also saved 1/2
million dollars on the cost
of the foundation. As well, square tubing was utilized where required
in the outer chordal planes of the structure to facilitate the
direct connection of a custom steel roof deck. This strategy saved
the expense of a support system, usually required in conventional
linear truss structures and ball-node type space frames. In total,
the design lowered the construction cost by $1 .935 million, or
12% of the total construction budget.
|
|
Technical Innovations
and Their Influence on Design: Space frame designs
represent a highly optimized information-based building approach,
as opposed to the traditional material-based building approach
utilized in conventional one-way truss designs. Cost savings on
materials realized through space frame designs were usually offset
by the higher cost information generation and management. While
in todays marketplace materials are still relatively cheap
and information is expensive, the balance is beginning to shift.
The conservation of materials effected by the use of materials-effective
space frame design will soon outweigh the simplicity of standard
construction methodologies.
|
|
The space frame was analyzed
with SPACE-Il, a proprietary special purpose finite element computer
program developed solely for 3-D analysis and design of space
frames.
|
|
Impact on the
Publics Perception of Structural Engineering:
The space frame construction is exposed to spectators on the
buildings interior, clearly making its structural design
the most striking and defining element of the building.
|